Why Mixed Methods Research Delivers Better Insights Than Single-Method Approaches
When numbers tell you what's happening but not why it matters
If Medium is your go-to reading spot, you can catch this post there too! Just click here.
In every project, researchers face a fundamental choice that will impact the quality of their findings: should they rely solely on numbers (quantitative research), exclusively on stories and experiences (qualitative research), or combine both approaches?
After over a decade of research across various contexts, I have consistently found that mixed methods research delivers richer, more nuanced and ultimately more actionable insights than single-method approaches. Let me show you why.
The Limitations of Single-Method Research
Before looking at the benefits of mixed-methods approaches, it’s worth understanding the inherent limitations of relying exclusively on either qualitative or quantitative methods.
Quantitative research alone provides statistical validity and measurable patterns, but often misses the “why” behind the numbers. Consider these situations:
A satisfaction survey shows that 68% of customers are “somewhat satisfied” with your client’s pizza delivery service, but you have no insight into what might move them to “very satisfied”
Web analytics reveal high drop-off rates on a specific page on your website, but you cannot tell what users found confusing or frustrating
Sales data shows regional variations in product popularity, but you do not have insight into the cultural or practical reasons driving those differences
On the other hand, qualitative research alone offers rich context and deep understanding of motivations, but struggles with:
Small sample sizes that may not represent broader populations
Difficulties in quantifying the prevalence or significance of issues you have identified
Challenges in demonstrating statistical reliability to stakeholders who expect “hard numbers”
Greater vulnerability to researcher bias in interpretation
These limitations aren’t flaws in the methods themselves: they are simply the natural boundaries of what each approach can achieve in isolation.
Sometimes, 1+1 equals 3
When thoughtfully combined, quantitative and qualitative methods don’t just complement each other. They can create synergies that generate insights neither could produce alone.
Let’s explore three simple yet impactful ways in which mixed methods can add value to your work.
1. Triangulation: Verifying Findings Across Methods
When multiple methods point to the same conclusion, your confidence in those findings increases substantially. For example, if survey data shows employees feel communication is poor, and interview data independently reveals communication challenges without prompting, you can be much more confident in this finding than if it emerged from just one source.
2. Complementarity: Filling in the Blanks
Each method can address questions the other cannot answer effectively:
Quantitative methods excel at answering “how many,” “how much” and “how often”
Qualitative methods better address “why,” “how” and “what does it mean”
Together, they can create a complete picture that neither could provide alone.
3. Development: Sequential Insights
Using findings from one method to develop and improve the application of the other creates a virtuous cycle. For example, consider this range of research scenarios, all of which could benefit from the above principle:
Initial interviews can identify the right questions to ask in a broader survey
Survey results can highlight specific areas needing deeper exploration through focus groups
Workshops can generate potential solutions that surveys can then validate across larger populations
When to Use Mixed Methods
While mixed methods research offers significant advantages, it requires more resources than single-method approaches. Here are situations where the investment typically delivers the highest returns:
Complex problems with multiple stakeholders (organisational change, service design, policy development)
Projects requiring both breadth and depth of understanding (market research for new products, user experience optimisation)
Situations where storytelling and statistics must work together (building consensus for change, securing funding for initiatives)
Research involving diverse populations (where varied data collection methods increase representation)
A Recipe to Get Started
Effective mixed methods research doesn’t happen by accident - it requires intentional design that integrates methods in complementary ways. The most successful mixed-methods researchers:
Begin with clear research questions that guide method selection
Plan for integration from the start, not as an afterthought
Consider sequence and timing of different methods
Develop analysis strategies that combine insights across data types
Create reporting narratives that weave quantitative and qualitative findings into coherent stories
At the end of the day, mixed-methods research isn’t simply about doing a survey and some interviews. It’s about weaving research approaches in ways that compensate for each other’s weaknesses and amplify their respective strengths.
In my course on mixed methods research, I share the frameworks, techniques and practical approaches I have developed as part of my research toolkit. Follow the links below to find out more, and do take a look at my free resources, too!
Course: https://www.chiarelliandrea.com/
Free resources: https://www.chiarelliandrea.com/free-resources
What research challenges are you currently facing that might benefit from a mixed methods approach? I’d love to hear about them in the comments.
I'm Andrea, a management consultant with over a decade of experience across industry and academia. I work with commercial, non-profit, academic and government organisations worldwide, helping them capture meaningful insights through mixed methods research.
I write about practical frameworks to help you discover what others miss. My main goal is to translate complex concepts into techniques that readers can use immediately.