Why Feedback Cultures Win
Three questions that keep burnout at bay
This article is a collaboration with
- check out her publication Honest Office to explore how we work and lead, one honest tool, story, and idea at a time.If Medium is your go-to reading spot, you can catch this post there too! Just click here.
Research by the World Economic Forum reveals a startling truth: 65% of workers are currently experiencing burnout, and 38% are at serious risk of mental health issues. That’s nearly two-thirds of employees walking a tightrope of exhaustion. And this is despite growing investment in wellness programs and recognition that “there is a clear investment case for improving employee health and well-being.”
Many organisations proudly proclaim, “We value feedback,” yet most feedback goes unspoken. The reason is neither apathy nor fear - it’s something far more mundane: nobody has built the habit.
In most workplaces, feedback is treated like a special event, reserved for annual reviews, performance interventions or awkward end-of-project retros. It’s not woven into the rhythm of daily work. So even when people have useful insights or need support, they hesitate, because when the feedback muscle isn’t exercised, it feels out of place. Like raising your hand in a meeting that already ended.
To build and protect not only high-performing teams, but engaged and satisfied ones (and to retain them) leaders must cultivate proactive, practical feedback habits that are part of day-to-day life. They must move from simply saying, “We value feedback," to saying, "We expect feedback, and here's how we intentionally make space for it." In inquiry-driven environments where feedback is constructive, helpfully framed, actionable and expected, burnout doesn’t stand a chance.
From small start-ups where feedback is conversational, to nonprofits navigating limited capacity and endlessly shifting priorities, to large enterprises struggling under the weight of annual reviews, the stakes are the same: without regular, intentional, and psychologically safe feedback, innovation stalls and exhaustion wins.
In the next few sections, we’ll compare real-world experiences, introduce three micro-feedback mechanisms you can begin today, and show how even formal 360° processes benefit from a shot of daily feedback energy.
The Link Between Feedback and Burnout
Burnout doesn’t come from overwork alone. It comes from working in a vacuum, without feedback, recognition or connection. When people feel like their effort disappears into silence and disconnection, they begin to disengage. When feedback is missing, direction blurs, progress is halted, and contributions go unacknowledged. Over time, that doesn’t just frustrate teams… it exhausts them!
It’s not that people don’t want feedback. Most do. What’s missing is the structure to ask and receive it consistently and constructively, especially the kind that feels safe, specific and non-performative. Saying “I’m open to feedback” is easy, but it’s passive, and probably won’t lead to anything substantive. It’s like saying, “I’m willing to talk to customers if they walk into my office.”
The real shift happens when someone asks:👉 “What feedback do you have for me?”It’s a simple question, but a radically different posture that tells the person you actually want to listen.
When this kind of proactive curiosity and intentionality becomes part of your daily work, you can achieve a high-feedback, low-threat environment. That’s where the magic happens: people share ideas earlier, recover faster from mistakes and avoid the quiet drift that leads to burnout.
Without such a culture of inquiry, even well-meaning, high-potential teams fall into silence. And silence, quite frankly, is a terrible manager.
Feedback in Small vs. Large Organisations
Most feedback culture failures aren’t malicious. They’re structural.
🏡 In small organisations, feedback often flows naturally. It happens in real time, often face-to-face, with no scheduling required. Think of a quick comment across desks, a check-in after a tough call or a Slack message that says, “Hey, that worked, keep it up!”
In these environments, feedback is woven into the rhythm of the day-to-day. There's less bureaucracy, fewer power dynamics and more direct access to decision-makers. That closeness can create a sense of immediacy and intimacy that makes feedback feel more human and personal.
But don’t mistake small for healthy. In many small teams, feedback depends entirely on the founder’s personality or a manager’s instincts. Maybe, if you’re lucky, there’s a tradition or two thrown in the mix. But the problem is the same, regardless. There's often limited shared language around what good feedback looks like in practice, or how to disagree constructively.
A helpful comment can easily be mistaken for criticism. Or worse, a well-meaning, potentially company-saving question can come across as a challenge to authority. Without a clear framework or a deep sense of psychological safety, small teams risk developing a culture where feedback is driven by hierarchy or dominant personalities, leading less assertive but often brilliant members to withhold their perspectives. And the result? A dynamic that undermines team learning, innovation, and organisational success.
🏫 In larger organisations, the challenge flips. There’s often no shortage of process - the opposite, in fact! There are HR systems, manager toolkits, calibrated reviews, engagement surveys, dashboards, pulse checks and formal 360s. But despite all the infrastructure, feedback can become ritualised and formalised to the point of disconnect. The annual review becomes a box-ticking exercise. Feedback is delivered as a sandwich, delayed by layers of hierarchy, or “stored up” to rot for end-of-quarter conversations.
When team members do speak up, their insights may be filtered through layers of interpretation, sometimes softened to avoid political friction. And when managers actually make time to ask for feedback, it’s not always clear what they’ll do with it. In environments like this, feedback may start feeling like a trap: risky to give, and unlikely to change anything.
As you can see, neither model is inherently better. And both require work.
Small teams need consistency, structure and clarity: a way to give feedback that doesn’t depend on the founder being in a good mood.
Large teams need frequency, immediacy and authenticity: a way to make feedback feel more human and impactful.
The organisations with the best culture treat feedback like a reflex. They build the muscle to ask real questions at every level. Not just, “How am I doing,?” but, “What should I be doing differently?” “Where are we stuck?” “What’s not working that no one’s said out loud yet?”
A feedback-rich culture is what sets high-trust, high-performing and connected teams apart: they make feedback normal. Not because it’s policy, but because it’s useful.
Three Questions To Move The Needle On Feedback Culture
If feedback is the muscle, then questions are the machines we use to train it! You don’t need a new platform, and you certainly don’t need a 10-step framework. You need leaders and team members consistently asking better questions that invite open and honest conversation.
Here are three deceptively simple questions that build the rhythm of feedback into daily work. When asked with intentionality and regularity, they do more than generate insight. They build trust, connection, energy, and resilience - the exact things burnout erodes.
📅 What’s one thing I could do differently next week?
This question is short, open and specific. It doesn’t require a performance review and simply invites a small, practical suggestion. It creates an expectation of change, not judgment. And it normalises the idea that improvement is ongoing.
Leaders who ask this consistently send a powerful signal: feedback is welcome and expected.
The phrasing matters, too. “One thing” makes the question feel achievable. “Next week” keeps it grounded in the present. And over time, this question builds a habit: not of critique, but of course correction, which, in burnout-prone environments, can mean the difference between sustainable growth and quiet collapse.
🛣️ What’s getting in your way right now?
Burnout doesn’t always look like breakdown. It could be simple process snarls, unclear priorities or meetings that offer more ideas than they do action steps. This question surfaces those frictions early, before they harden into tension, frustration and disengagement.
It’s not just a question for managers. Teammates can ask it of each other. Project leads can open stand-ups with it. What matters is not who asks, but whether there’s space for trust and connection that inspire a real answer.
You should definitely expect silence at first. People aren’t used to being asked what’s hard, or what might be limiting for them right now. But if you ask this question regularly, and then actually act on what you hear, you’ll uncover solvable issues that no pulse survey could ever reveal.
🧑🏽💼 What feedback would you give your manager?
This question breaks hierarchy without breaking trust. When a manager’s manager asks this with sincerity and receives the answer without defensiveness, it transforms the power dynamic and cuts through the noise. It makes it clear that honest feedback doesn’t stop at the level immediately above you.
The impact of this question is in what it signals: psychological safety, accountability and an organisation that doesn’t treat hierarchy as immunity.
To be effective, skip-level feedback must be part of a repeatable process and not a one-time audit. When done quarterly (and with clear confidentiality boundaries), it becomes one of the most powerful levers for improving leadership quality and team health.
None of these questions are magic on their own. But when asked with regularity and intentionality, they can help reshape culture from the inside out.
Ask them out loud. Put them in retros, 1:1s, team meetings. Use them even when things are going well. Especially when things are going well.
Make Feedback a Daily Question
As we have just seen, feedback culture doesn’t begin with a policy but with a question… and then a willingness to act on what you hear.
When people are clear on how to ask for feedback and confident that something will happen - even if small - when they do, team dynamics shift for the better. Small issues surface before they grow into big ones. Difficult conversations happen earlier. Recognition becomes more meaningful because it’s grounded in real, everyday context.
Burnout thrives in silent spaces, and feedback interrupts this with clarity, connection and opportunity. Not grand interventions, but small shifts: we’re talking about nudges that help people actually feel heard and supported.
You don’t need to overhaul your performance review system or launch a new initiative to get started. You just need to ask the right questions often enough that they stop feeling awkward and unusual. So, start with these three:
What’s one thing I could do differently next week?
What’s getting in your way right now?
What feedback would you give my manager?
And when someone offers you an answer, don’t treat it like a challenge, treat it like a gift!
I'm Andrea, a management consultant with over a decade of experience across industry and academia. I work with commercial, non-profit, academic and government organisations worldwide, helping them capture meaningful insights through mixed methods research.
I write about practical frameworks to help you discover what others miss. My main goal is to translate complex concepts into techniques that readers can use immediately.
 | A guest post by
|
I kept nodding through this piece, especially at the line, "burnout thrives in silent spaces."
I've seen too many brilliant teams drift into disconnection simply because feedback became rare, formal, or filtered through too many layers. You nailed the paradox: so many leaders say they want feedback, but they don’t build the habits or signals that make it safe to give.
Thank you both for writing something so actionable, human, and deeply needed.