The Art of the Escape Route: Why Your Survey Needs More Off-Ramps

The secret to getting honest, complete survey responses? Give people more ways to not answer your questions

If Medium is your go-to reading spot, you can catch this post there too! Just click here.

Picture this: you are reviewing a customer experience survey for a major retailer. On paper, it looks perfect: 92% completion rate, neat data across all questions, statistically significant sample size. The executives will be thrilled.

Then you notice something odd. Every single respondent has rated their experience with the company’s "express checkout lane" – a service the company has piloted in only 3 of their 50 stores. That’s impossible, unless people are making up answers.

At this point, you dig deeper and discover the ugly truth: faced with required questions about services they have never used, respondents have simply picked middle-of-the-road answers to progress through the survey. The data is pure fiction. Expensive, decision-distorting fiction.

It sounds counterintuitive, but the surveys with the most "escape routes" – ways for participants to indicate a question doesn't apply to them – consistently yield richer and more reliable data, as well as having higher completion rates.

Let me explain why your instinct to force responses might be sabotaging your research, and how building in the right escape routes can transform your survey from a compliance exercise into a genuine conversation.

The Forced Choice Fallacy

There's a fundamental tension at the heart of survey design. On one side, we have researchers and stakeholders who want complete data sets – no missing values, no gaps in the analysis, every cell in the spreadsheet filled with a neat option or rating. It's an understandable desire. Clean, complete data makes for easier analysis, clearer reports and more confident conclusions.

On the other side, we have the messy reality of human experience. Not everyone has used every feature. Not everyone has an opinion on every topic. Not everyone's life fits neatly into our predetermined categories.

Imagine you are filling in a survey about workplace technology and encounter this question:

How satisfied are you with your company's project management software?

🔘 Very dissatisfied

🔘 Dissatisfied

🔘 Neither Dissatisfied nor Satisfied

🔘 Satisfied

🔘 Very satisfied

Seems reasonable, right? But what if your department doesn't use project management software? What if you have never interacted with it? What if you literally started yesterday?

This is where the survey experience starts to break down. Without an escape route, participants face an impossible choice. They can abandon the entire survey, losing all their previous responses and wasting the time they've already invested. They can pick randomly, essentially adding noise to your data. Or – and this is what most people do – they can choose the neutral option, which you will later interpret as "no strong feelings either way" when it actually means "this question makes no sense for me."

The damage compounds with each forced choice. By the third or fourth irrelevant required question, participants attitudes shift: they stop trying to give accurate responses and start trying to just get through. When participants feel cornered by questions they can't honestly answer, something fascinating happens psychologically. They shift from being engaged research partners to resentful rule-followers. They start "satisficing" - giving minimally acceptable answers just to move forward. In these cases, participants may develop coping strategies, like always pick the middle option, alternate between positive and negative or create patterns that have nothing to do with their actual experiences.

Now multiply this frustration across multiple questions, across hundreds of respondents, and you understand why technically "complete" surveys can end up being filled with more fiction than fact.

Exploring Escape Routes

The standard "prefer not to answer" is like offering someone a single emergency exit in a building. Functional, but not sufficient. It's also vague: it could mean "this is too personal," "I don't know," "this doesn't apply to me" or a dozen other things. When only a single opt out option is available, you lose valuable information about why people are opting out.

What we need instead is a richer vocabulary of escape routes, to provide ways for participants to tell us not just that they can't answer, but why. These effectively turn into “diagnostic” escape routes and transform non-responses from data gaps into data points.

For Experience-Based Questions

Classic scales (e.g. Likert scales) assume that every respondent will be able to provide a rating. This could be about satisfaction, frequency or other relevant features. But the reality is that there are always some respondents whose circumstances will differ and who will not be able to provide an answer that is aligned with your scales. Instead of forcing them to guess or to provide a response that doesn’t fully represent their experience, let them tell you where they are in their journey.

How often do you use our mobile app's budgeting feature?

🔘 Daily

🔘 Weekly

🔘 Monthly

🔘 A few times a year

🔘 I am aware of the feature but haven't used it

🔘 I didn't know this feature existed

🔘 I don’t use the mobile app

Those last three options? They are goldmines of insight that would otherwise be buried in false responses: for example, if they weren’t available and I hadn’t used the feature being investigated, I’d pick ‘Rarely’, which would clearly misrepresent my experience. What you need, instead, is insight:

• Someone who knows the feature exists but hasn’t used it may benefit from use cases, examples or training

• Someone who doesn't know a feature exists needs marketing and outreach

• Someone who doesn't use the app at all needs a completely different conversation

For Knowledge Questions

Knowledge questions are particularly tricky because they can feel like tests. Nobody wants to admit they don't know something they feel they should know. This is especially common in workplace surveys, where people might worry about looking incompetent or out of touch. Without good escape routes, you'll get people claiming understanding they don't actually have.

The solution is to normalise not knowing. Make it clear that awareness and understanding exist on a spectrum, and that identifying knowledge gaps is valuable, not shameful:

How would you rate your understanding of our new sustainability policy?

🔘 Very clear understanding

🔘 Good understanding

🔘 Basic understanding

🔘 Limited understanding

🔘 I haven't read the policy yet

🔘 I wasn't aware of this policy

🔘 This doesn't apply to my role

Each escape route tells you something different and valuable. "Haven't read it yet" suggests awareness but lack of time or priority. "Wasn't aware" indicates a communication breakdown. "Doesn't apply to my role" might reveal assumptions about who needs to know what – assumptions that often will be worth challenging.

For Sensitive Topics

Sensitive questions require the most thoughtful escape routes because the stakes are higher. When asking about job satisfaction, personal life, financial stress or workplace relationships, a blunt "prefer not to answer" can feel like an admission of a problem. People need graceful ways to maintain their privacy while still contributing to the research.

The key is to provide escape routes that preserve dignity and acknowledge legitimate reasons for not sharing:

How often do you engage in physical activity?

🔘 5 or more times per week

🔘 3-4 times per week

🔘 1-2 times per week

🔘 Occasionally

🔘 Rarely or never

🔘 I have physical limitations that prevent me from engaging in physical activity

🔘 I prefer not to say

That second-to-last option recognises that some people have invisible disabilities, chronic conditions or temporary injuries that make mainstream forms of physical activity impossible or inadvisable. Without this escape route, they would be forced to either select "rarely or never" (which implies choice rather than circumstance) or skip the question entirely. By acknowledging these edge cases upfront, you show respect for the full range of human experiences and avoid making people feel shame about circumstances beyond their control.

Here’s another tip - not about escape routes but about language. I've deliberately used 'physical activity' rather than 'exercise' here because 'exercise' implies structured, intentional fitness routines, while 'activity' encompasses all types of movement. This removes the judgment that some activities 'count' while others don't, helping you genuinely capture the extent to which respondents might be active. You can, of course, explore the types of physical activity as part of later questions!

Designing Smart Escape Routes

The art lies in creating escape routes that inform rather than just excuse. This is where many surveys fall short – they might include a generic "N/A" option, but that tells you nothing about why the question doesn't apply. Was it a timing issue? A role mismatch? A communication gap? Without specificity, you're left guessing.

Instead of those generic options, you should craft escape routes that tell you the story behind the opt-out. "I haven't experienced this situation" suggests something different from "This predates my time here" or "My role doesn't involve this." The first might indicate a process that's not as universal as you thought. The second could reveal high turnover or recent changes. The third might expose assumptions about who does what in your organisation.

Positioning matters too. You should always place escape options at the end of your response list, visually separated from the main choices, if your platform of choice allows for this. This subtle design choice encourages participants to genuinely consider whether any of the primary options fit their experience before opting out.

For complex topics, you can go even further by implementing progressive disclosure. Rather than showing everyone every question and relying on escape routes, let participants indicate their level of experience upfront. A simple "Have you managed remote team members?" can route people to relevant questions or skip them entirely to the next applicable section. This isn't just about efficiency, it's about respect for your participants' time and experience.

Remember: if 40% of people are using an escape route, that's not a failure of your survey design. It's intelligence about your participant population or the relevance of a question. Maybe that feature you thought was universal is actually niche. Maybe that process you're asking about hasn't been rolled out as widely as leadership believes. Sometimes, patterns in escape route usage might even say more than the standard response options!

Your Escape Route Checklist

Before launching your next survey, ask yourself:

✓ Can someone new to the organisation/product/service complete this honestly?

✓ Does every question have an appropriate "out" for someone it might not apply to?

✓ Are your escape routes informative, not just dismissive?

✓ Have you tested with edge cases (new employees, occasional users, etc.)?

✓ Do your required questions truly need to be required?

The Data Quality Dividend

Let’s take a look at what happens when you implement proper escape routes:

1. Drop-off rates plummet. Quite simply, people finish surveys when they don't feel trapped and can genuinely express their thoughts.

2. Response quality improves. When participants know they can skip irrelevant questions, they engage more thoughtfully with the ones they do answer.

3. Data becomes more reliable Would you rather have 100 responses where 30 are guesses, or 70 responses that are all genuine? The latter wins every time.

Every survey is fundamentally a trust transaction. You're asking people to give you their time and honest thoughts. When you force them to answer questions that don't apply, you break that trust.

But when you say, "Hey, if this doesn't apply to you, just let us know," something great happens. Participants relax. They trust you more and become more willing to share difficult truths because they know you respect their reality. What’s especially interesting is that none of this is a conscious decision in most cases: it’s just the wording of your questions and the response options you provide that create a safe space for respondents.

Great surveys are all about creating a journey that adapts to each participant's reality. When you design surveys that respect the complexity of human experience – including the experience of not having an experience – you get data that actually means something.

The next time you're tempted to make every question required, remember: the best data comes from participants who choose to answer, not those who have to.

---

I'm Andrea, a management consultant with over a decade of experience across industry and academia. I work with commercial, non-profit, academic and government organisations worldwide, helping them capture meaningful insights through mixed methods research.

I write about practical frameworks to help you discover what others miss. My main goal is to translate complex concepts into techniques that readers can use immediately.